Search the courses, subjects, tracks, games and features, or jump straight to a page.
Learn it your way
A short class with Sarah and her students. The other ways are under More.
Sign up free to listen. Transcripts are free to read.
A classmate has written three paragraphs on “The Whitsun Weddings” and each one begins with the word then. What is wrong?
It is retelling the story. First the train leaves, then the weddings begin, then it arrives.
Right. That is summary. A critical appreciation has three jobs: explain, analyse and evaluate.
So explain is what the poem is about, analyse is how it is made, and evaluate is how well it works?
Exactly. Summary can support your argument, but it can never be your argument.
Then what would an argument for this poem look like?
For example: Larkin turns social comedy into quiet affirmation by changing what his observer notices. That is a claim you can prove.
Let us build a paragraph on the last stanza. Give me a point.
The ending gathers the poem's feeling into one image of release and risk.
Good. Now evidence. Name the stanza and describe the image precisely. If you remember a few words exactly, you may add them.
In stanza 8 the feeling of coming down is compared to a volley of arrows that vanishes from view and lands as rain.
Good. And the effect?
Rain suggests fertility and renewal, but arrows cannot be called back, so the hope has some risk in it.
Point, evidence, effect. Finish by linking it to the poem's wider meaning and you have a strong paragraph.
I find the speaker a little snobbish about the families in stanzas 3 and 4. Does that spoil the poem?
It is fair to say so, and many readers notice it. How would you handle it in an appreciation?
I could call it a weakness of the speaker, but say that it makes his change of heart more honest.
That is evaluation: you have judged, and you have justified. What else might a modern reader notice?
That the poem looks through one observer's eyes, in a period when marriage was expected of most young people.
Careful and fair. You can say a poem belongs to its time and still admire what it achieves.
a critical appreciation explains the poem's meaning, analyses how it is made and evaluates how well it works.
open with a one-sentence claim and make every paragraph support it, using point, evidence and effect.
eight ten-line stanzas rhymed ababcdecde, mostly iambic pentameter, with long run-on sentences that keep the voice natural.
departure, discovery of the weddings, the filling of the train, the approach to London and the closing image mirror the movement of the speaker's feeling.
plain, exact diction, a weather arc from sunlit heat to rain, and a closing simile of arrows that holds hope and risk together.
weigh strengths such as control and a convincing change of feeling against reservations such as early condescension, and give a reason for every judgement.
A thesis sentence: in “The Whitsun Weddings” Larkin turns a comic railway journey into a quiet affirmation by changing what his observer notices, from the families' clothes and jokes to the hour that all the couples share.
A point, evidence and effect paragraph on the ending: the ending gathers the poem's feeling into one image of release and risk (point); in stanza 8 the feeling of coming down is compared to a volley of arrows that vanishes from view and lands as rain (evidence); rain suggests fertility and renewal, while arrows that cannot be recalled suggest that the couples' futures are open and unseen (effect).
An evaluation sentence with a reason: the speaker's early condescension towards the wedding families is a weakness that some readers will resent, but it makes his later sympathy more convincing because he has had to travel away from it.
A comment on form with its effect: the regular ababcdecde stanza gives the poem control and dignity, while long sentences running across the line endings keep the voice natural, so the poem sounds like thoughtful talk inside a formal frame.
Explain, analyse, judge, with no retelling and no fudge.
Imagine you are a guide on the Whitsun train. First you tell passengers what the journey is about. Next you point out how the track is laid, the stanzas and the stops. Then you show them the views, the heat at the start and the rain at the end. At the terminus you give your verdict, praising what is fine and admitting what is not.
Point, Evidence, Effect, or PEE, is the three-step engine of every body paragraph.
S.T.I.F.L.E. - Subject and theme, Tone, Imagery, Form, Language, Evaluation: do not stifle your answer, cover all six
Term
What are the three jobs of a critical appreciation?
Click to flip
Term
What is the form of the poem?
Click to flip
Term
How does the structure follow the journey?
Click to flip
Term
What is the weather arc of the poem?
Click to flip
Term
What does the closing simile suggest?
Click to flip
Term
What might a modern reader question in the poem?
Click to flip
A reasoned personal response to a poem that explains its meaning, analyses how it is made and judges how well it works.
The speaker created by the poet, here the solitary traveller who narrates the journey, who need not be the same person as the poet.
The pattern of rhyming line endings in a stanza, written with letters; in this poem every stanza rhymes ababcdecde.
A line of ten syllables in five pairs, each pair an unstressed syllable followed by a stressed one, the commonest rhythm of English verse.
The running on of a sentence across the end of a line or stanza without a pause.
Language that creates pictures and sensations in the reader's mind, such as sights, sounds, smells and comparisons.
A comparison using the word like or as; the poem's closing image is a simile.
Holding mixed or opposite feelings about the same thing, as when a speaker both mocks and admires.
A critical appreciation explains what a poem is about, analyses how it is made and judges how well it works. This lesson gives you a method and a worked model for “The Whitsun Weddings”, covering its subject and theme, structure and form, imagery and language, tone, and a balanced evaluation of its strengths and limits.
This lesson shows how to move from understanding Larkin's poem to appreciating it. After placing the poem in its time, as the title poem of Larkin's 1964 collection and a picture of a mid-century Whitsun weekend, it works through the questions an examiner expects you to answer: what the poem is about and what it finally means, how its eight ten-line rhymed stanzas and its journey structure shape the experience, what its imagery and plain, conversational language achieve, and how its tone changes. It then weighs the poem's strengths against what a modern reader may question, and ends with a model appreciation and a checklist you can use under examination conditions.
A critical appreciation is not a summary and not a list of devices. It is a reasoned, personal response to a poem, supported by evidence. This lesson builds that response for “The Whitsun Weddings” in stages, and finishes with a model you can study and a checklist you can use.
Keep one line of argument from the first sentence to the last. Each paragraph should make a point, support it with a precise reference to a stanza or image (and, where you remember them exactly, a few words from the text), and explain the effect. Retelling the story may support your argument, but it cannot be your argument. Check your own paper for the length and marks expected.
“The Whitsun Weddings” is the title poem of Philip Larkin's 1964 collection. Larkin, who worked as a university librarian in Hull, is often grouped with the Movement poets of the 1950s, who preferred plain speech, clear form and everyday English life to ornate or Romantic display. The poem follows a train from Hull to London on the Saturday of the Whitsun weekend, a holiday when many couples married and set off on a short honeymoon. Whitsun is a church festival that was also, in Larkin's day, a public holiday weekend popular for weddings, and the title joins these in two words. Use this context in a sentence or two, and only where it explains something in the poem: why the platforms are crowded with wedding parties, why one afternoon can bring so many couples onto one train, and why an everyday habit of English life can carry so much feeling.
The tone moves from ironic detachment and a slight superiority in the early stanzas, through amused observation of the wedding parties, to sympathy as the speaker looks past the families to the couples, and finally to a lyrical and guarded hope. The mood moves from drowsy to festive to hushed to uplifted. Mention the change in your appreciation, because the change is the poem's shape. The lesson on tone and mood treats it in detail.
Philip Larkin's “The Whitsun Weddings” turns an ordinary train journey from Hull to London into a poem about how strangers share the great turning points of life. A solitary traveller sets out on a hot holiday Saturday and, station by station, watches wedding parties see off newly married couples who board his train. What begins as social comedy becomes, by its last stanza, a quiet affirmation.
The structure follows the journey. Eight ten-line stanzas, rhymed ababcdecde and written mostly in a loose iambic pentameter, give the poem a firm frame, while long sentences running across line and stanza ends keep the voice conversational and unhurried. The poem moves from the drowsy departure of stanzas 1 and 2 to the discovery of the weddings in stanzas 3 and 4, the filling of the train in the middle stanzas, the approach to London in stanza 7 and the closing image of stanza 8, so that the movement of the train and the movement of feeling are the same.
The imagery and diction are mostly plain and exact. Heat, glare and smell make the journey physical, and the families on the platforms, with their loud jokes and showy clothes, are drawn with a comic realism that fixes the poem in mid-century England. The poem opens in sunlit heat and ends with rain, and the final simile, a volley of arrows that vanishes and comes down as rain, gathers all the feeling into one image of release, fertility and risk.
The tone changes with the setting. The early irony and slight superiority give way to sympathy as the speaker looks past the families to the couples and recognises the hour they share without knowing it. The close is hopeful but guarded.
The poem is not beyond question. The speaker's early condescension and the poem's mid-century outlook may trouble a modern reader. Yet the first is part of the poem's honesty, since it gives the later sympathy its weight, and the closing image is among the finest in Larkin's work. The poem earns its tenderness: a detached observer is slowly moved, and so are we.