Search the courses, subjects, tracks, games and features, or jump straight to a page.
Learn it your way
A short class with Sarah and her students. The other ways are under More.
Sign up free to listen. Transcripts are free to read.
Today, we’re starting with Bayesian Updating. It’s an approach where we adjust our confidence in a hypothesis based on new evidence—like initial user test results. Can anyone explain what a prior weight might mean?
Is it like our initial guess about something?
Exactly! Let’s say we think a feature is 70% effective based on our assumptions. If we test it and get new feedback, we revise our belief. What do you think that process would look like?
We probably take the new feedback into account and adjust that 70% accordingly?
Right! This means we can better focus on what works. Remember, knowledge progresses as we gather more data.
So, are we weighing evidence differently as we test more?
Absolutely! More tests lead to more informed decisions. Let’s summarize, Bayesian Updating helps us adjust our beliefs with new data—key to effective decision-making.
Now, let’s dive into the Kano Model. It’s great for feature evaluation. The features are categorized into three types: ‘Must-have,’ ‘Performance,’ and ‘Delighters.’ Can anyone give an example of a must-have feature?
I think a login function for an app would be a must-have?
Spot on! What about a feature that makes the app stand out completely?
Maybe a customizable interface could be a Delighter?
Exactly! This approach lets us align our designs with user expectations. By identifying which features are critical, we can ensure we satisfy our users more effectively.
So how do we decide if something is a performance feature?
Good question! Performance features increase satisfaction when executed well. We gauge their importance based on user feedback and market trends. Summarizing, the Kano Model helps us strategically prioritize features based on user desires.
In Bayesian’s flight, updates keep it right, changing beliefs with new insights.
Imagine a ship captain adjusting their course based on changing weather patterns; this is like a designer updating their feature based on user feedback.
For Kano, think M-P-D: Must-have, Performance, Delighter.
Kano: Keep Analyzing Needs and Opportunities.
Term
Bayesian Updating
Click to flip
Term
Kano Model
Click to flip
This section explores various decision-making methodologies used to assess and prioritize design features.
The section delves into key decision-making frameworks such as Bayesian Updating and the Kano Model. It emphasizes the importance of adapting decision-making processes based on initial user data and categorizing features to meet user expectations and delight.
This section introduces critical decision-making methodologies essential in the design process. The methodologies covered include Bayesian Updating and Kano Model Mapping. Bayesian Updating focuses on incorporating user test results to refine prior assumptions, enhancing accuracy in decision-making. The Kano Model categorizes features into three groups: ‘Must-have’, ‘Performance’, and ‘Delighter’, providing a structured approach to prioritize features based on user satisfaction. Understanding these methodologies enables designers to make informed choices, balancing user needs and technical feasibility, ultimately contributing to a validated concept.