Search the courses, subjects, tracks, games and features, or jump straight to a page.
Learn it your way
A short class with Sarah and her students. The other ways are under More.
Sign up free to listen. Transcripts are free to read.
Close your eyes and think of the opening. Which sound do you hear first?
The door closing with a thud. The word itself sounds like the noise.
What do we call a word that imitates a sound?
Onomatopoeia.
Good. Now the lectern scene in stanza 2. What do the echoes do?
They seem to snigger at the speaker, as if the building were laughing.
So which device gives the building human behaviour?
Personification. It shows that the church is mocking his play-acting.
List some words in the poem that belong to the language of the church.
Font, lectern, pyx and rood-loft.
And how does the speaker himself usually talk?
Casually, like a man chatting. He even uses vague words for the sacred objects.
So what does the contrast tell us?
That he knows the words but does not share the belief behind them.
Now the title. In what two ways can it be read?
As the habit of going to church, and as the church itself going, meaning dying out. The speaker is a sightseer while churches are disappearing.
What is the central symbol of the poem?
The church. At first it stands for religion, but by the end it stands for the human need to be serious.
Which device fills the middle stanzas?
Rhetorical questions. The speaker keeps asking what will happen to churches.
What is special about the last six lines?
They form one long sentence that moves slowly towards the dead.
What effect does that create?
Dignity and calm. The ending feels steady and unhurried, not excited.
the speaker's casual voice contrasts with the technical vocabulary of the church, and the contrast measures his distance from belief.
the thud of the door and the sniggering echoes make the building audible and give it a personality.
the speaker's words and actions contradict each other, and the title means both going to church and the church going.
the church, the ruin, the cycle-clips, the ground and the dead each carry meaning, and the church's meaning grows during the poem.
a series of rhetorical questions in the middle stanzas gives way to one long, calm sentence at the close.
seven nine-line stanzas in loose iambic pentameter with a repeated rhyme pattern, and enjambment and caesura that keep the verse close to speech.
Onomatopoeia: the word thud in line 2 imitates the sound of the heavy door, which makes the reader hear how hollow and quiet the empty church is.
Personification: in stanza 2 the echoes seem to snigger at the speaker, so the building appears to mock his play-acting, which shows his discomfort in a place whose rituals he does not share.
Irony: the speaker treats the visit as hardly worth the trouble at the end of stanza 2, yet stanza 3 admits that he stops at churches often. The contradiction shows that his indifference is a pose.
Syntax: the last six lines of the poem (lines 58-63) are a single sentence that moves steadily towards the dead, and this long, unhurried sentence gives the conclusion dignity and calm.
Thud at the door and a snigger in the hall; two meanings in the title, one symbol for all; questions in the middle, one long calm line; that is the way that Larkin makes his plain design.
Imagine a detective in the church. He finds a sound clue (the thud), a witness who laughs at him (the echoes), a contradiction in the suspect's story (irony), a double meaning on the label by the door (the title) and a closing statement delivered in one breath (the long final sentence).
Some People Intend Quiet Speech stands for Sound (stanza 1), Personification (stanza 2), Irony (stanza 3), Questions (stanzas 3 to 6) and Syntax (the long final sentence).
S.P.I.D.E.R.S. - Symbol, Personification, Irony, Diction, Enjambment, Rhetorical question, Sound
Term
Which word in line 2 imitates a sound, and what is the device called?
Click to flip
Term
What device is used when the echoes seem to snigger at the speaker?
Click to flip
Term
In what two ways can the title "Church Going" be read?
Click to flip
Term
What is the effect of the long sentence in the last six lines?
Click to flip
Term
Which two registers of language are set against each other in the poem?
Click to flip
Term
What does the repetition of the word serious do in stanza 7?
Click to flip
The voice or character through which a poet speaks; the speaker of "Church Going" is a persona and should not be assumed to be Larkin in every detail.
The kind of language suited to a situation, such as casual conversation or the formal vocabulary of religion; the poem moves between several registers.
A gap between what is said and what is meant, or between what is expected and what happens; the poem is ironic in its words, its situations and its title.
Giving human actions or feelings to something that is not human; the echoes of stanza 2 seem to snigger.
A word whose sound imitates the thing it names, such as thud.
The running of a sentence over the end of a line without a pause, so that the sense carries on into the next line.
A pause inside a line, usually marked by a colon, semicolon or full stop.
An object or image that stands for a larger idea; in the poem the church stands for faith, tradition and the human need for seriousness.
This lesson identifies the main literary devices in Philip Larkin's "Church Going" and explains what each one does. It covers voice and diction, imagery, personification and other figures of speech, irony and the title, symbolism, and the poem's form and syntax.
Larkin's devices are quiet ones. The speaker's colloquial voice, set against the technical vocabulary of the church, creates distance and humour. Sound words such as thud and snigger, and the echoes that seem to mock the speaker, bring the empty building to life. Irony runs through the poem and is summed up in its double-meaning title. The church itself is the central symbol, supported by the ruin and by the ground and the dead of the last stanza. In form, the poem uses seven nine-line stanzas in loose iambic pentameter, with sentences that run across line endings and a long closing sentence. For each device the lesson shows how to name it, locate it and explain its effect.
Philip Larkin writes in a plain, conversational style, so the devices in "Church Going" do not decorate the poem; they carry its meaning. A good answer on devices does three things for each one: it names the device, it locates it by stanza or line number, and it explains the effect on the meaning or feeling of the poem. The sections below follow that method.
The poem is spoken by a first-person speaker, a persona who sounds like an ordinary, educated man thinking aloud. In the early stanzas his diction is colloquial and offhand: he uses vague everyday words for sacred objects and qualifies what he says. Against this the poem sets the technical vocabulary of the church: font, lectern, pyx, rood-loft, and the old-fashioned words plate and parchment. The speaker knows the vocabulary but not what it means to a believer, so the contrast between the two registers measures his distance from the church. In stanza 7 the diction becomes abstract and weighty (compulsions, destinies, obsolete, hunger), and this change of register marks the move from joking to seriousness.
The poem draws on several senses. Sound: the thud of the door (line 2) and the echoes in stanza 2. Touch: the speaker's hand moving round the font. Atmosphere: the silence is called musty, a word we normally use for stale or damp air, so that silence seems to have a physical presence. Sight: brown flowers, brass objects at the altar end, a roof that looks freshly done, and then, in the middle stanzas, a ruin of weeds, brambles, stone and sky. The final image is the burial ground around the church. The images begin as small objects in a room and widen to a landscape and finally to the dead, so the imagery follows the poem's movement from the personal to the universal.
Irony runs through the poem. The speaker says that the visit was hardly worth the trouble, yet he admits that he stops at churches often. He plays at reading out a lesson, but it is the echoes that mock him. He is not a believer, yet he behaves with reverence and ends by calling the place serious. The title is itself ambiguous. "Church Going" can mean the habit of attending church, and it can also mean the church going, that is, disappearing from the life of the community. The poem explores both meanings, and the second gives the first an ironic edge: the speaker is a church-goer only as a sightseer, in an age when churches themselves are going.
The church is the central symbol. It stands for religious faith and tradition, but by the end it also stands for the human need for seriousness and for the great events of life and death. The cycle-clips are a small symbol of ordinary modern life carried into a sacred place. The ruin in the middle stanzas symbolises the decay of belief. The ground and the dead of the last stanza symbolise mortality, which the speaker treats as the deepest source of seriousness. The silence is a symbol too: it holds the accumulated weight of everything that people have felt in the building.
The poem has seven stanzas of nine lines each, in loose iambic pentameter, with a rhyme pattern that repeats in every stanza. The rhyme is handled so lightly that the poem sounds more like speech than song. Sentences run over line endings (enjambment) and halt in the middle of lines at colons, semicolons and full stops (caesura), so the verse follows the rhythm of thought. The first two stanzas are in the present tense, which makes the visit feel immediate. The grammar also shows the poem's progress: short, separate observations in the first stanza, a long chain of questions in the middle, and a closing sentence of six lines (lines 58-63) that moves steadily to the dead and gives the ending dignity and calm.
Use the pattern name, place, effect. For example: in stanza 2 the echoes seem to snigger at the speaker; this is personification, and it makes the building appear to mock his play-acting, which shows how uncomfortable he is. Avoid listing devices without explaining them, because examiners reward the effect and not the label.