Search the courses, subjects, tracks, games and features, or jump straight to a page.
Learn it your way
A short class with Sarah and her students. The other ways are under More.
Sign up free to listen. Transcripts are free to read.
If you had to sum up the poem's argument in one sentence, what would it be?
Suffering always happens while other people are busy with something ordinary.
Who, according to Auden, understood this?
The Old Masters, the great painters. He says they always understood suffering correctly.
How is the argument organised?
A general claim and several examples first, then one painting, Bruegel's Icarus, in detail.
General to particular: the shape of a good argument, and of a good appreciation answer.
How would you describe the poem's voice?
Calm and conversational, like someone chatting in a gallery.
Why would a poem about suffering use such a calm voice?
Because the poem is about how calmly the world carries on while someone suffers.
And the hidden rhymes?
They are there but easy to miss, like Icarus in the painting.
So the manner of the poem is part of its meaning.
What is the poem's greatest strength?
The ending. The ship just sails on, and the poem stops without comment.
Can you raise an objection?
Some people might find it complacent, as if Auden accepts indifference.
How would you answer that?
By making us notice what the ploughman ignores, the poem refuses to be indifferent itself.
A criticism, then a reasoned reply. That is a mature evaluation.
written in Brussels in December 1938 after Auden saw Bruegel's paintings; collected in Another Time (1940).
suffering always takes place amid ordinary life, as the Old Masters understood and Bruegel's Icarus shows.
a general claim with several examples, then one painting in close detail, ending on an image.
conversational diction, juxtaposition, bathos, understatement, transferred epithets and vivid colour imagery.
long, loose lines and hidden rhymes, with a calm voice whose ease mirrors the world's indifference.
manner and meaning are fused; the charge of complacency is answered by the poem's act of noticing.
An introduction for an appreciation: written in Brussels in December 1938, "Musée des Beaux-Arts" is an ekphrastic poem in which Auden draws on Bruegel's paintings to argue that suffering always happens while the world is busy elsewhere.
A point on structure: the poem moves from a general claim supported by several examples to a single painting examined in detail, so it reads like a persuasive argument that ends on decisive evidence.
A point on tone: the calm, conversational voice is not a weakness but part of the meaning, because it imitates the calm with which the world carries on around suffering.
An evaluative point: although some readers find the poem complacent, it makes us notice the drowning boy whom the ploughman ignores, so it understands indifference without sharing it.
Claim, then examples, then Icarus near; calm words, hidden rhymes, a ship sailing clear; weigh the complaint that it is too serene, then show how it makes us see what is unseen.
Two students visit the Brussels museum. One walks quickly past the Icarus painting, admiring the fields and the ship. The other stops, notices the legs in the water, and spends the bus ride home thinking about everyone the world overlooks. Auden wrote his poem for the second student.
Calm Arguments Seldom Shout, Truly Effective stands for Context, Argument, Structure, Style, Tone, Evaluation.
S.H.I.P. - Structure from general to particular, Hidden rhymes, Indifference as preoccupation, Power of the final image
Term
What is the poem's central argument?
Click to flip
Term
How is the poem structured?
Click to flip
Term
Why is the calm tone effective?
Click to flip
Term
What makes the ending powerful?
Click to flip
Term
What is one possible objection to the poem?
Click to flip
Term
How can that objection be answered?
Click to flip
A balanced, evidence-based evaluation of a poem's content, technique and effect.
A literary work that responds to a work of visual art.
The great European painters working before about 1800.
Placing contrasting things side by side for effect.
Presenting something as less important than it really is.
A sudden drop from the serious to the trivial.
Uncritical satisfaction with things as they are.
The quality of being relevant to people in all times and places.
A critical appreciation of W. H. Auden's "Musée des Beaux-Arts". It evaluates how a calm, conversational meditation on paintings by Bruegel becomes a profound statement about suffering and indifference, and how its structure, diction, imagery and loose form serve that meaning.
"Musée des Beaux-Arts" (written in Brussels in December 1938 and collected in Another Time, 1940) is one of the most admired short poems of the twentieth century. This lesson appreciates it as a whole. It considers the poem's context and argument, its themes of suffering's place in ordinary life and the world's indifference, its two-part structure that moves from a general claim to one painting, its conversational diction, juxtapositions and understatement, its central image of a boy's legs vanishing into a green sea, and its loose, almost hidden rhymes. It then weighs the poem's strengths against possible objections (that its calm is complacent, or that it accepts indifference too easily) and shows how to structure an ISC critical appreciation.
A critical appreciation judges a poem as a whole: what it says, how it says it, and how well it succeeds. For "Musée des Beaux-Arts" the key insight is that the poem's quiet manner is itself part of its meaning.
W. H. Auden (1907–1973) wrote the poem in December 1938 while staying in Brussels, after visiting the Museum of Fine Arts, which holds works associated with Pieter Bruegel the Elder. It first appeared in New Writing in spring 1939 and was collected in Another Time (1940). The poem is ekphrastic: it responds to paintings, especially Landscape with the Fall of Icarus, in which the mythical boy who flew too close to the sun drops into the sea almost unnoticed. It was written weeks after the Munich Agreement and Kristallnacht, with Europe moving towards war.
The poem opens with a claim: the Old Masters always understood suffering correctly, because they knew its human position. Suffering happens while others are absorbed in ordinary things. The first stanza supports this with examples: old people awaiting a miraculous birth while children skate nearby, and a martyrdom running its course in a messy corner while dogs carry on and the torturer's horse scratches itself. The second stanza turns to Bruegel's Icarus: every figure looks elsewhere; the ploughman may have heard the splash and cry but treats the fall as unimportant; the sun shines as it must; and a fine ship, whose crew must have seen the astonishing sight, sails on towards its destination.
The central theme is the place of suffering in ordinary life, together with the world's indifference to it. Auden presents this indifference as preoccupation rather than cruelty: the ploughman must plough, the ship must sail. Related themes include the meeting of the miraculous and the everyday, the indifference of nature, and art as a source of truth, since the painters saw what the onlookers missed.
The two stanzas are deliberately unequal. The first, longer stanza states a general truth and gathers several examples; the second, shorter stanza tests the truth against one painting in close detail. The movement from general to particular gives the poem the shape of a persuasive argument. Within the stanzas, long sentences run across the line breaks, and the second stanza unfolds as a single sentence that keeps moving past the disaster, as the ship does. The poem ends not with a comment but with an image, leaving the reader to judge.
The lines are long and irregular, closer to speech than song. The poem does rhyme, but irregularly and at a distance, so the rhymes are easy to miss. This suits the theme: the poem's patterns, like the suffering in the paintings, are present but overlooked.
The tone is calm, reflective and conversational, with flashes of wry humour, yet an undercurrent of sadness gathers in the final images. The gap between the relaxed voice and the grave subject is the source of the poem's quiet power.
The poem's greatest strength is its fusion of manner and meaning. A calm voice describing indifference makes the reader feel how easily suffering is absorbed into ordinary life. Its argument is economical: one claim, a handful of examples, one closely observed painting. Its final image of the ship sailing on is among the most memorable endings in modern poetry, and its theme has proved universal, which is why the poem is so widely anthologised; the same painting also inspired later poets such as William Carlos Williams. Possible objections deserve consideration. Some readers find the calm complacent, as if Auden accepted indifference too easily; others note that the poem depends on the reader picturing paintings they may not know. Yet the calm is double-edged: by making us notice what the ploughman ignores, the poem refuses his indifference even while it understands it. And the descriptions are vivid enough to stand without the paintings.
"Musée des Beaux-Arts" turns a visit to a gallery into a lasting reflection on how the world treats suffering. Through its argument from general to particular, its everyday language, its pointed contrasts and its unforgettable closing image, it shows that the most profound truths can be spoken quietly.