Search the courses, subjects, tracks, games and features, or jump straight to a page.
Learn it your way
A short class with Sarah and her students. The other ways are under More.
Sign up free to listen. Transcripts are free to read.
Today, we will discuss surrogates. Can anyone tell me what a surrogate is used for in environmental monitoring?
Is it a compound that behaves like the analyte we're interested in?
Exactly! We use a surrogate because it mimics the behavior of the analyte during the extraction process. For our example, if we have 1 liter of water and add 1 ml of a 100 mg/L surrogate, what mass are we actually adding?
That would be 0.1 mg, right?
Correct! Understanding this is crucial because we'll later calculate the recovery from this surrogate. Let's move on to the extraction with hexane.
Why do we use hexane for extraction specifically?
Great question! Hexane is non-polar and effectively extracts non-polar substances from water. Now, if we take out 40 ml from our 50 ml extract, there's a reason behind that. Can anyone think of it?
It must be because we can't remove all of it perfectly due to the interface between the two liquids.
That's right! Let's recap: surrogates help us calculate recoveries, and extraction techniques like using hexane maximize recovery efficiency.
Now that we have our extract, why do we concentrate it down to 1 ml before analysis? Any ideas?
To increase the concentration of analytes for better detection?
Exactly! Higher concentrations improve detection limits. Let’s look at how this ties into our calibration response.
What does the calibration response actually tell us?
It relates the instrument response to the known mass of our analyte. For example, if our calibration is represented by the equation Response = 60,000 * m, when the instrument reads 80,000 units, how do we find m?
By rearranging the equation, it would be m = 80,000 / 60,000.
Correct! Now let’s apply this. What would be the mass of the surrogate we injected?
That would be 1.33 nanograms, based on the adjusted numbers!
Perfect! So remember, calibration is key in determining the concentration of our analytes.
After determining the mass from our calibration, how might we back-calculate to find out how much surrogate (or analyte) was initially in our sample?
Do we divide the mass found by the volume of the sample we took?
That's right! We then multiply by our recovery factor. What happens if we find we recovered more than we added?
It could suggest an error in calibration or measurement.
Exactly, and careful unit conversion helps avoid pitfalls. Let's practice a calculation next!
Let's discuss extraction efficiency. Why is it often low for solid samples?
Because of poor mass transfer, right?
Exactly! While extracting from solids or filter papers, techniques like ultrasonication can help. What is matrix interference?
It's the effect that other substances in the sample have on the analyte we want to measure.
Right again! This is why we use surrogates to compensate for interference. Remember to keep this in mind when designing experiments.
Now, let’s summarize what we've moved through. We discussed surrogates, extraction procedures, concentration, and calibration response. What’s the most crucial point about surrogates?
They help estimate the analyte's concentration during analyses.
Great! What about matrix interference?
It can skew our results if not properly controlled.
Absolutely! This is why careful method design and calibration are critical. Let’s tackle a few practice problems to cement this knowledge.
A compound used to mimic the behavior of an analyte during analysis.
The percentage of the analyte recovered compared to what was initially added.
The equation used to quantify the relationship between sample mass and instrument response.
How effectively the analyte is extracted from the sample matrix.
Other compounds present that can impact the results for the analyte.
If 100 mg of surrogate is added to a 1-liter sample, and 0.1 mg is recovered during analysis, the recovery rate would be calculated to assess extraction efficiency.
Using a calibration response equation of Response = 60,000 * m helps determine the amount of analyte injected into the machine based on the instrument response.
For every analyte, a surrogate we find, to track how much was left behind.
Once upon a lab, a chemist named Lee used a friend's help, a surrogate, you see! They extracted their sample with hexane so bright, and found results that were just right!
Remember 'CAME' for calibration: Concentration, Analyte, Measurement, Efficiency!
SER for Surrogate Extraction Recovery.
Term
Surrogate
Click to flip
Term
Recovery
Click to flip
A compound that behaves similarly to the analyte of interest, used to assess recovery rates in analytical chemistry.
The proportion of the analyte that is successfully extracted and detected in a sample relative to the amount initially added.
The relationship between the amount of analyte injected into an instrument and its corresponding response, usually expressed as an equation.
The effectiveness of a particular method to extract the analyte from a sample matrix.
The impact of other substances present in a sample that can affect the measurement of the target analyte.
This section discusses the calibration response method used to analyze the concentration of an analyte in a solution by comparing it with a surrogate's response.
The section elaborates on the concept of surrogate analysis in environmental monitoring, detailing the extraction process involving chemical concentrations, the significance of calibration in quantitative analysis, and the methodology for recovering the target mass from a sample through a series of calculations.
In this section, the calibration response method is explained through a practical example involving an analyte of interest (A) and a surrogate (B). A 1-liter sample undergoes an extraction procedure where 50 ml of hexane is used to separate compounds. Students learn about recovery calculations, where the response from the surrogate is measured to estimate the analyte's concentration. The section also highlights the importance of calibration equations in determining the mass of analyte present based on instrumental response. Issues of efficiency and potential errors due to extraction losses are discussed, emphasizing the calculation of recovery rates and the significance of surrogate analysis in achieving accurate environmental sampling results.