Search the courses, subjects, tracks, games and features, or jump straight to a page.
Learn it your way
A short class with Sarah and her students. The other ways are under More.
Sign up free to listen. Transcripts are free to read.
Today, we're discussing rings, an essential algebraic structure in mathematics. A ring is defined as a set combined with two operations. Can anyone tell me what those operations are?
Is it addition and multiplication?
Correct! We often refer to these operations as plus and dot, but they are abstract operations over the set. Now, to form a ring, what properties do you think these operations must satisfy?
I think one of them should be associativity for both operations.
Exactly! Associativity is crucial. In fact, we need our set to satisfy several axioms, starting with the set being an abelian group under addition, which includes properties like closure and commutativity.
So, does that mean there must be an identity element for addition?
Yes! That identity element is often denoted as zero in our notation. Additionally, for multiplication, we also need an identity, which is 1.
What about the distributive property?
Great question! The distributive property must hold for multiplication over addition. This means if you have elements a, b, and c, the second distributive law is also necessary. Any questions before we recap?
In summary, for a set to be a ring, it must be an abelian group under addition, adhere to closure and associativity under multiplication, and satisfy the distributive property. Now, let's move on to understand examples of rings.
So, let's look at a familiar example: the integers modulo N. Can anyone explain how addition and multiplication work in this context?
Is it like, if I add two numbers, I just take their result modulo N?
Exactly! If you add two integers within the range of 0 to N-1, you'll wrap around when you reach N. What about multiplication?
We also take the result modulo N, right? So we ensure it’s still within that range?
Correct! Both operations keep the results confined to the set. Now, can anyone give me an example of an element that does not have a multiplicative inverse in this ring?
How about the element 2 in Z_4? It doesn’t multiply with any element to give us 1!
Right again! That leads us to the concept of unit elements within a ring. Remember, a unit is an element that has a multiplicative inverse.
To summarize, Z_N exemplifies a ring where both addition and multiplication are performed modulo N. However, not all elements need to have inverses. Now let's move on to fields.
We've discussed rings; now let's explore fields. A field is basically a special type of ring. What do you think sets fields apart from rings?
Is it that every non-zero element has an inverse?
Exactly! In a field, except for the zero element, every element must be invertible under multiplication. This leads us to our important field axioms.
What are those axioms?
First, the set must be an abelian group under addition. Secondly, when we exclude the additive identity, the remaining elements must also form an abelian group under multiplication. Finally, multiplication must distribute over addition.
So, does this mean all polynomial functions are fields too?
Not all polynomial rings are fields, but when you have a prime modulus, then integers modulo p will form a field, as every non-zero element is invertible.
Awesome! So, rings have more restrictions than fields in terms of which elements are required to have inverses.
Exactly! To summarize, fields extend the concept of rings by ensuring all non-zero elements have inverses, allowing for more complex operations. Now we will shift our focus to polynomials over rings.
Now let's discuss polynomials. What is a polynomial, and how does it relate to rings?
It's like an expression of variables raised to powers, right?
That's right! A polynomial can be expressed in the form of coefficients multiplied by variables raised to powers. But over a ring, we use the ring’s operations for both addition and multiplication.
So if I have a polynomial defined over Z_N, I would add and multiply using modulo N?
Exactly! This is an essential concept - expanding the traditional definition of polynomials to various rings. How would you add two polynomials defined over Z_N?
We would add the coefficients of corresponding powers modulo N?
Precisely! Do you remember how we multiply them?
Yes! We have to consider the degree and multiply all combinations of coefficients, ensuring to add them up after performing the multiplication modulo N.
Excellent! In summary, polynomials over rings require that we use the ring’s operations, thus generalizing our understanding of polynomials significantly. Now, let’s check a few examples.
Rings and numbers take a swirl, add and multiply, let operations unfurl.
Imagine you have a magical box (ring). Inside it, numbers can play by rules: they can pair up and do tricks as long as they remember to follow the magical operations of plus and dot!
Remember R.A.F. for Rings, Axioms, and Fields - A helpful acronym to keep in mind the main concepts.
RAP for Rings: R for closure, A for associativity, P for identity.
Term
What is a Ring?
Click to flip
Term
What distinguishes a Field?
Click to flip
An algebraic structure consisting of a set equipped with two operations that satisfy certain axioms.
A special type of ring wherein every non-zero element has a multiplicative inverse.
An expression that represents a sum of terms, each composed of a coefficient and a variable raised to a non-negative integer power.
An element in a ring that has a multiplicative inverse.
Basic assumptions or rules that must hold true for a mathematical structure.
This section discusses the definitions and key properties of rings, fields, and polynomials over rings.
The section examines the algebraic structures known as rings and fields, defining their axioms and properties. It also introduces polynomials over rings, explaining how operations are generalized from traditional polynomial definitions.
In this section, we delve into the fundamental concepts of rings and fields, both essential algebraic structures in discrete mathematics. A ring is defined as a set equipped with two operations (often referred to as plus and dot) that satisfy specific axioms:
Examples of rings include the integers modulo N, where both operations respect these axioms. The section also talks about the invertible elements in a ring, leading to the definition of the group of units, U(ℝ), where U(ℝ) contains all elements with a multiplicative inverse.
Next, we extend the definition of rings to fields, which are rings where every non-zero element is also invertible. The axioms for a field demand that the additive group property and the multiplicative group property (excluding zero) be satisfied, and we observe that fields allow for a richer structure.
Finally, we discuss polynomials over rings, which generalize traditional polynomial definitions to include coefficients from any ring. Polynomials follow the same operations, using the ring's addition and multiplication, maintaining closure and associative properties under these definitions. This sets the foundation for polynomial algebra in abstract algebra.