Search the courses, subjects, tracks, games and features, or jump straight to a page.
Learn it your way
A short class with Sarah and her students. The other ways are under More.
Sign up free to listen. Transcripts are free to read.
Let's begin by discussing the union of relations. If you have two relations, R1 where x < y and R2 where x > y, how would we define their union?
Isn't the union just all the pairs where x is not equal to y?
Exactly! So if we take the pairs from R1 and R2, the union encompasses all pairs (x, y) such that x ≠ y. This encompasses both cases where x < y and x > y. Remember this as U.N.I.T. — Union gives Notably Inclusive Tuples.
What about the intersection? Does it also have a physical representation?
Good question! The intersection of R1 and R2 would be empty since no real number can satisfy both x < y and x > y simultaneously. It's great to visualize this!
Now let's look at the difference of two relations, R1 and R2. If I subtract R2 from R1, what can we expect?
We should get back R1 then, right? Because anything in R1 that isn't in R2 remains.
Precisely! It filters R1 down to only those pairs where x < y. Always think of it as filtering through — D.E.L.E.T.E — Difference Extracts Lesser Elements That Exist.
Can we visualize these operations in a set diagram or graph?
Absolutely! Graphically representing relations can enhance understanding significantly.
Now, let's explore composition. If we have relation R from set A to B and relation S from B to C, what does forming S o R communicate?
Is it a direct path from A to C through B?
Yes! S o R signifies that we first apply R, and then apply S. Remember this chain of reasoning!
How do we denote the composition?
Wonderful question! It's denoted as S o R and indicates the order matters here. Think C.R.A.F.T — Composition Requires Application First Then.
Moving on to the powers of a relation. What is R^2 if R consists of all ordered pairs (1,2), (2,1)?
Isn't R^2 just the composition of R with itself?
Exactly! It's about taking R and applying it again. Think of it as R multiplied by itself — P.O.W.E.R.S — Powers Outline Where Each Relation Starts.
And how would R^3 work in this context?
Great follow up! R^3 follows the same logic: composition of R^2 with R yet again. We can observe how relations compound over compositions.
Finally, let's talk about the closure of a relation, which ensures that a relation fulfills certain properties. Can someone define reflexive closure?
Isn't that when we add the pairs like (a, a) to meet reflexivity?
Yes, exactly! It's the smallest expansion necessary to satisfy that property — RES.A.L.T — Reflexive Expansion Satisfies All Logical Terms.
What about for symmetric properties?
For symmetric closure, we use what’s called the inverse of the relation. It guarantees that if (a, b) is in the relation, then (b, a) must be included too, ensuring symmetry.
The union of two relations R1 and R2 contains all pairs (x, y) where either x < y from R1 or x > y from R2, ultimately capturing all pairs (x, y) where x is not equal to y.
The intersection of R1 and R2 results in the empty set, as no pair (x, y) can satisfy both x < y and x > y simultaneously.
The difference R1 - R2 returns the pairs where x < y and is not included in R2, effectively giving us back R1.
This operation involves combining two relations, R from set A to B and S from B to C. The composition, denoted as S o R, allows us to derive relationships from A to C by passing through B, facilitating transitive relationships.
Powers indicate repeated applications of a relation through composition. R^1 is the original relation, R^2 is R composed with R, and so on. The concept illustrates how transitive relations develop as we increase power.
This concept focuses on creating the smallest superset of a given relation that satisfies a specific property (reflexive, symmetric, transitive). For example, reflexive closure adds pairs (a, a) if they're missing to enforce reflexivity.
Illustrative examples help clarify these definitions. For instance, the closure for the reflexive property adds necessary pairs to ensure all elements within a set relate to themselves. Thus, understanding these operations is essential for grasping how relations function within discrete mathematics.
Union example: For R1 {(1, 2), (2, 3)} and R2 {(2, 1), (3, 2)}, the union is {(1, 2), (2, 3), (2, 1), (3, 2)}.
Intersection example: For R1 {(1, 2)} and R2 {(2, 1)}, the intersection results in an empty set.
Powers example: If R consists of {(1, 2), (2, 3)}, R^2 might include pairs like {(1, 3)} through combinatory paths.
When relations come to play, Union keeps pairs all day.
Imagine a town where each person can only see their relationship. The union lets everyone see all while the intersection finds the lost pairs always sharing.
UBDA – Union Brings Distinct All, useful in remembering union properties.
C.R.E.A.T.E – Composition Results in Effective Association Through Elements.
Term
What is a union of relations?
Click to flip
Term
What is an intersection?
Click to flip
Term
Define composition of relations.
Click to flip
Term
What does reflexive closure mean?
Click to flip
The combination of two relations such that any element in either relation is included.
The set of elements that are common to both relations.
The set of elements in one relation that are not in another relation.
A method of combining two relations to create a new relation based on their order.
The repeated application of a relation through composition.
The smallest superset of a relation that satisfies a specific property.
The smallest relation that includes (a, a) for all elements a in the set.
The smallest relation that ensures if (a, b) is in R, then (b, a) is also in R.
The smallest relation that includes all transitive relationships derived from it.
This section explores set-theoretic operations on relations, including union, intersection, differences, powers, and closures.
In this section, we discuss several operations that can be performed on relations, including union, intersection, and the differences between relations. We also introduce the concepts of powers and closures of relations, explaining their significance and providing illustrative examples.
Intersection of Relations
In this section, we delve into the operations that can be performed on relations in discrete mathematics. A relation is defined as a set of ordered pairs, and it allows us to utilize set-theoretic operations such as union, intersection, and set differences.
Union of Relations: The union of two relations R1 and R2 contains all pairs (x, y) where either x < y from R1 or x > y from R2, ultimately capturing all pairs (x, y) where x is not equal to y.
Intersection of Relations: The intersection of R1 and R2 results in the empty set, as no pair (x, y) can satisfy both x < y and x > y simultaneously.
Difference of Relations: The difference R1 - R2 returns the pairs where x < y and is not included in R2, effectively giving us back R1.
Composition of Relations: This operation involves combining two relations, R from set A to B and S from B to C. The composition, denoted as S o R, allows us to derive relationships from A to C by passing through B, facilitating transitive relationships.
Powers of a Relation: Powers indicate repeated applications of a relation through composition. R^1 is the original relation, R^2 is R composed with R, and so on. The concept illustrates how transitive relations develop as we increase power.
Closure of Relations: This concept focuses on creating the smallest superset of a given relation that satisfies a specific property (reflexive, symmetric, transitive). For example, reflexive closure adds pairs (a, a) if they're missing to enforce reflexivity.
Illustrative examples help clarify these definitions. For instance, the closure for the reflexive property adds necessary pairs to ensure all elements within a set relate to themselves. Thus, understanding these operations is essential for grasping how relations function within discrete mathematics.