Search the courses, subjects, tracks, games and features, or jump straight to a page.
Learn it your way
A short class with Sarah and her students. The other ways are under More.
Sign up free to listen. Transcripts are free to read.
Heritagisation is the process of recognizing certain buildings or sites as important to a culture. In Kiruna, the conservation plan from 1984 identified many significant buildings. Can anyone give me an example of a notable building in Kiruna?
Isn't the Kiruna Church one of the important ones?
Exactly! The Kiruna Church is a great example. It holds significant cultural relevance. Can anyone describe why emotional connections to these buildings matter?
Because they represent our history and community identity!
Precisely! Buildings like Kiruna Church embody stories and memories. Remember, 'HERITAGE' helps us sum this up. H for history, E for emotions, R for recognition, I for identity, T for tradition, A for architecture, G for genealogy, E for experience.
Got it! So, heritagisation really connects to our roots and keeps our stories alive.
Well said! To summarize, heritagisation connects us to our past and helps in the recognition of places that are vital for future generations.
Now, let’s delve into the various stakeholders involved in Kiruna's heritage preservation. Who can name some of these stakeholders?
There’s LKAB, the mining company, right?
And the Kiruna Kommun, which is the municipal board!
Exactly! LKAB, as a state-owned company, has financial responsibilities, whereas Kiruna Kommun takes care of administrative support. Can anyone tell me why understanding their roles is essential?
If we know what they do, we can see how decisions can impact the community and heritage!
Spot on! This relationship is complicated. To remember it, think of the acronym 'TLC' – T for tension, L for local communities, C for collaboration. Stakeholders must work together despite their differences.
That’s really helpful! Collaboration sounds crucial.
Indeed. In summary, recognizing stakeholders like LKAB and Kiruna Kommun is key to understanding heritage conversations and the conflicts involved.
As we consider relocating heritage buildings, what do you think some practical issues might arise?
Costs could be a major concern!
Absolutely! The costs of disassembling and moving buildings can be very high. Jennie Sjoholm talks about how some buildings might not be worth relocating. Have any of you experienced a similar situation in your community?
Yes! Our town had to tear down an old hall because it was too expensive to fix.
Exactly! Sometimes buildings can't be preserved because of costs or feasibility. To remember these factors, use 'C.A.P.' – Costs, Accessibility, Practical considerations. It sums up our dilemma!
Nice! I'll remember that.
In summary, relocation poses financial and logistical challenges that we must carefully manage to preserve our heritage.
Finally, let's discuss what the future might hold for Kiruna's heritage. What uncertainties do we face?
Will the mining operations affect the buildings still standing?
Good point! There's always uncertainty in mining. Additionally, the investments in new technologies might not guarantee success. Anyone know an analogy to explain this concept?
Like planting a seed and not knowing if it will grow because of unpredictable weather!
Exactly! That’s a perfect analogy. To keep this in mind, think of the '4 W's': What will happen? Who will decide? When will changes happen? Where will the community go? These questions help guide our understanding of the future.
Those are great guiding questions!
In summary, looking forward, we must remain vigilant and proactive regarding the challenges and uncertainties Kiruna's heritage faces.
The formal process of recognizing buildings and sites as culturally significant.
Reaffirming the importance of previously recognized heritage.
The downgrading of a cultural site's importance.
The interactions and relationships among various parties involved in heritage decisions.
Heritage bright, buildings so tight, stories we tell, keep memories well.
Imagine a town where buildings hold secrets of old; moving them means losing stories that never unfold.
Remember 'HERITAGE': History, Emotions, Recognition, Identity, Tradition, Architecture, Genealogy, Experience.
Use 'TLC' for Stakeholders - Tension, Local communities, Collaboration.
Term
What is heritagisation?
Click to flip
Term
What is re-heritagisation?
Click to flip
The process of formally recognizing a site or building as important to cultural heritage.
The acknowledgment and reaffirmation of existing heritage items in light of new contexts.
The process of downgrading or removing the cultural significance of a heritage item.
Individuals or organizations with an interest or concern in a particular issue or project.
A strategic framework designed to protect and preserve important heritage buildings.
The section discusses the complexities surrounding Kiruna's heritage amidst the relocation of significant buildings due to mining activities.
This section delves into the heritage of Kiruna, highlighting the challenges of moving historical buildings, the roles of various stakeholders, and the processes of heritagisation, re-heritagisation, and de-heritagisation. It emphasizes the emotional and cultural importance of preserving history while adapting to modern demands.
This section elaborates on Kiruna's rich cultural heritage and the challenges faced during its relocation due to mining operations by the LKAB state-owned company. As Kiruna undergoes significant transformation, Jennie Sjoholm's work emphasizes understanding emotions tied to the heritage buildings and how different stakeholders—like LKAB, the municipality (Kiruna Kommun), and railways—play crucial roles in this process.
Key aspects discussed include:
Through this discussion, the text captures the emotional ties people have with their heritage and the complexities involved in balancing preservation with modern development needs.