Search the courses, subjects, tracks, games and features, or jump straight to a page.
Learn it your way
A short class with Sarah and her students. The other ways are under More.
Sign up free to listen. Transcripts are free to read.
Today, we're going to discuss the importance of truck positioning in relation to the excavator. Can anyone tell me why it's better to have the truck positioned close to the excavator?
Well, I think it's about making it easier to load the truck quickly?
Exactly! When the truck is close, the cycle time decreases because the angle of swing is minimized. In fact, when a truck is positioned at a 90-degree angle to the bucket, it’s in an ideal spot. Can anyone guess what happens to productivity if the truck is further away?
The productivity decreases because the excavator has to swing more, right?
Correct! Greater swing angles lead to longer cycle times and reduced productivity. Think of it this way: 'Closer is faster'! They both start with 'C' - a simple mnemonic to remember! Now, why do we want to minimize physical effort in heavy machinery?
To maximize efficiency, I guess.
Exactly! Great job! Remember, less effort equals more efficiency.
Let's delve into correction factors next. Why do you think we need to apply correction factors when the actual height of cut differs from the optimum?
Because it affects how effectively we can move the material?
Exactly! If the actual height of cut is the same as the optimum, the correction factor is 1, meaning no adjustment is necessary. When the cut is less than optimum, we apply a correction factor to account for reduced productivity. Can anyone help me remember the relationship between height of cut and productivity?
Higher cut means more effort, so we need to reduce productivity in our calculations?
Right! Conversely, the angle of swing works similarly. More than 90 degrees means we decrease productivity, while less than 90 degrees means we increase it. A useful rhyme is: 'Swing wide, productivity slides; swing tight, productivity's bright.'
That's a fun way to remember!
I'm glad you like it! Remember, adjustment factors are critical for accurate productivity forecasting!
Now, let's cover operational constraints like truck spotting clearance. Can anyone explain why it's necessary to have space for tail swing?
To prevent collisions when the excavator is turning?
Correct! We need enough clearance to avoid accidents, which can halt productivity. Speaking of productivity, what’s haul unit exchange time?
It’s the time taken for one truck to leave and another to enter for loading?
Exactly! We want to minimize this time to streamline operations. A good way to remember this is: 'Quick turnaround equals quick work.'
That’s catchy! I’ll remember it!
Great! Always keep these operational constraints in mind, as they directly affect your productivity estimates.
Let’s learn how to estimate shovel productivity! What do we need to consider in our calculation?
The heaped volume of the bucket and the cycle time, right?
Exactly! The formula also includes applying the correction factors for height of cut and swing angle. Can someone recall how job efficiency fits into this?
It’s how much time the machine spends working in an hour?
Spot on! If a shovel works for 45 minutes in an hour, you must multiply the productivity by that efficiency. A memory aid I have is: 'Work smart, not long!'
I like that saying!
Great! Keep that in mind when calculating productivity at your work sites.
Now, I have a practical problem for us to solve. A crawler mounted shovel with a bucket capacity of 3.44 cubic meters is loading rock, working at 3.18 meters high. How do we begin?
First, we need the optimum height of cut for this excavator.
Correct! If the maximum digging height is 10.6 meters, and we're working with blasted rock, we use 50% for optimum height. So what's that?
That would be 5.3 meters, so our actual height is 60% of the optimum.
Exactly! We then look for correction factors based on our conditions. What correction should we apply?
We will use the correction factor of 0.91.
Well done! So, how do we finish our productivity estimate?
Calculating based on the cycle time and fill factor and then applying that correction factor!
Perfect! Applying these principles in real scenarios is vital for accurate estimates. Keep practicing!
Factors that influence the productivity of excavations based on conditions.
The vertical measurement of material to be excavated that impacts productivity.
Defines how effectively the machine can load and unload material with minimized movement.
A multiplier used for adjusting productivity estimates related to changes in conditions.
The time during which the equipment is actively working, affecting overall productivity.
Close the truck for less luck, swing it wide, future's a ride. Productivity soars with minimal chores!
Imagine a rabbit (the truck) needing to eat carrots (the load) while a tortoise (the excavator) slowly turns. If the tortoise turns slowly and the rabbit is far away, it takes longer for the rabbit to eat the carrots. If they are close, the rabbit eats quickly and hops off.
Use the acronym 'PET' for Planning, Efficiency, and Timing, which are crucial for excavation productivity.
RACE: Remember to Always Consider Efficiency when estimating productivity.
Term
Correction Factor
Click to flip
Term
Cycle Time
Click to flip
Term
Job Efficiency
Click to flip
The horizontal angle between the digging (loading) and dumping position of the bucket.
The total time taken for an excavator to complete one loading cycle.
A multiplier used to adjust productivity estimates based on deviations from ideal conditions.
The time required for a loaded truck to leave its position for an empty truck to take its place.
The proportion of time that machinery is actively working compared to the total available time.
The ideal height at which excavating operates most efficiently, typically between 30% to 50% of maximum digging height.
The necessary space left for an excavator's tail swing to avoid collisions when the excavator rotates.
This section discusses the adjustment factors affecting the productivity of excavation equipment, focusing on the height of cut and angle of swing.
The section details how the positioning of trucks relative to excavators influences cycle time and productivity. It emphasizes the ideal conditions for height of cut and angle of swing, correction factors for deviations, and operational considerations such as truck spotting clearance and haul unit exchange time.
Overview: This section of the chapter discusses the adjustment factors that affect the productivity of excavation machines, particularly focusing on the height of cut and the angle of swing.
Mobility Considerations: Poor mobility necessitates positioning the truck as close as possible to the excavator, commonly at a 90-degree angle. This positioning minimizes the horizontal swing angle between loading and dumping, thus reducing the cycle time and enhancing productivity.
Ideal Conditions: The ideal production setup involves having the truck positioned at 90 degrees to the excavator's bucket. In this scenario, the angle of swing is also considered optimal.
Correction Factors: The correction factors depend on:
Operational Considerations:
Estimating Shovel Productivity: The formula for productivity includes the heaped volume of the bucket, cycle time, and adjustment for height and swing factors. Job efficiency, determined by operational time per hour, also impacts productivity calculations.