Search the courses, subjects, tracks, games and features, or jump straight to a page.
Learn it your way
A short class with Sarah and her students. The other ways are under More.
Sign up free to listen. Transcripts are free to read.
Today we will calculate the downtime cost based on equipment costs. For instance, if we know our equipment costs 900 rupees per hour, what would you estimate a 3% downtime cost to be?
It would be 27 rupees per hour.
Correct! Now, if the machine operates for 2000 hours in a year, what would be the annual downtime cost?
That would be 54,000 rupees!
Great job! Remember, we can calculate these costs cumulatively each year to see the bigger picture of our equipment expenses.
Let's dive into cumulative costs. After the first year, we had a downtime cost of 54,000 rupees. If the second year sees a cost of 1,08,000 rupees, what would the cumulative cost be?
It would be 1,62,000 rupees!
Exactly! Each year, we need to keep adding these values to properly understand the increasing costs. This cumulative approach is crucial for budgeting.
Now, which of you can explain why downtime affects productivity and what actions might be required to recover?
Downtime means we're not producing anything! To recover, we need either more operating hours or extra machines.
Exactly! This increased cost means we need to calculate a productivity adjusted cumulative downtime cost. Can anyone provide an example?
Sure, if our productivity factor is 0.98, it means we need to adjust our costs accordingly to bring productivity back up.
Wonderful! Such adjustments illustrate the complexity of managing equipment costs.
We need to consider obsolescence. How would you go about calculating obsolescence costs based on equipment usage?
If our obsolescence factor for the second year is 0.05, we would multiply it by the equipment cost, right?
Exactly! What would that come out to?
That’s 45 rupees per hour.
Correct! And for the total annual cost, how would you compute this?
By multiplying it by 2000, which means 90,000 rupees for the year.
When machines break down and can't spin, remember costs pile up, where losses begin.
Imagine an old farmer with an ancient tractor. He keeps fixing it while better ones pass by. His costs are rising without gaining too much crop. He realizes it's time to invest in new.
D-O-W-N for downtime: D = Duration, O = Operational loss, W = Wasted resources, N = Need for change.
P.A.C.E. for productivity adjustments: P = Productivity Impact, A = Additional Costs, C = Cumulative Effects, E = Efficiency Restoration.
Term
What is downtime cost?
Click to flip
Term
What does cumulative cost mean?
Click to flip
This section outlines the process of calculating obsolescence costs related to equipment, including downtime and productivity adjustments over an operating period.
The section discusses the methodology for determining downtime costs based on equipment operation hours and obsolescence factors. It emphasizes the significance of cumulative costs over the lifespan of machinery, accounting for productivity impact and justifying the replacement of outdated equipment.
In this section, we explore the calculation of obsolescence costs associated with equipment depreciation over time. Initial calculations start with the downtime cost per hour, which is derived as a percentage of equipment cost. For example, if equipment costs 900 rupees per hour, then a 3% downtime rate leads to a cost of 27 rupees per hour.
As machines operate over specified hours annually (2000 hours/based on the first year), these individual downtime costs contribute to cumulative annual costs, which can escalate if not carefully monitored. For instance, in the first year, this amounts to 54,000 rupees, rising to 1,08,000 rupees in the second year with an increased downtime factor of 6%. This cumulative approach emphasizes the growing cost of maintaining older machinery.
However, beyond these costs, productivity loss is also addressed, indicating that downtime not only incurs direct costs but could also mean additional workforce or machinery needs to regain production efficiency. The obsolescence factor further complicates the calculation, as it reflects the lost value of a machine due to advancing technology and alternative models entering the market.
Annual obsolescence costs are calculated similarly, shown to increase incrementally each year. The importance of evaluating these cumulative costs helps organizations decide when to replace machinery to minimize overall financial impact, marking the 'economic life' of equipment and indicating the best time for a change in investment to newer technologies.