Loading the lesson
Loading the lesson
Search AllRounder.ai
Search the courses, subjects, tracks, games and features, or jump straight to a page.
Search the courses, subjects, tracks, games and features, or jump straight to a page.
Learn it your way
A short class with Sarah and her students. The other ways are under More.
Sign up free to listen. Transcripts are free to read.
Today, we'll discuss the controversial amendments to the Indian Constitution made during the 1970s, particularly under the Emergency. What do you think influenced these changes?
I think it was due to the political situation. The government needed more control.
Exactly! The imposition of Emergency in June 1975 allowed the government to enact certain amendments without the usual scrutiny. Can anyone tell me the amendments enacted during this period?
The 38th, 39th, and 42nd amendments, right?
Right! These amendments were viewed critically, especially the 42nd amendment. Why do you think that was?
Because it changed fundamental rights!
Correct! It also affected the Preamble and attempted to limit the judiciary's powers. Let's remember the acronym 'FRAUD' to recall these amendments: Fundamental Rights Altered, Unjustly Dominated.
Now, let's focus on the 42nd amendment. What were some major changes it proposed?
It sought to extend the Lok Sabha's duration from five to six years.
And it made the judiciary's review power weaker!
Good points! The amendment aimed to assert parliamentary power. The Supreme Court’s rulings were essentially being overridden. How did the opposition respond?
They viewed it as unconstitutional and fought back with legal challenges.
Absolutely! This leads us to the vital role of the judiciary. Can anyone tell me what happened as a result of these clashes?
The subsequent amendments like the 43rd and 44th aimed to overturn the controversial changes!
Exactly! Remember, 'JAM' for Judicial Action after the Amendments.
Following the Emergency, restoration of constitutional balance was critical. How did the 43rd and 44th amendments address this?
They rolled back a lot of the changes the 42nd amendment made.
Correct! And why is this significant in understanding the Constitution's evolution?
It shows that amendments can be controversial and that political contexts matter a lot.
Exactly! Remember, 'EVA' - Evolution of the Values in Amendments, signifies how changes reflect societal values.
A period when normal constitutional governance is suspended.
Major changes made during the Emergency affecting fundamental rights and judicial authority.
The landmark ruling that established limits on Parliament's power to amend the Constitution.
The extension of the Lok Sabha's duration from five to six years was a significant change, reflecting the government's priority during the Emergency.
The 42nd amendment introduced the Fundamental Duties of citizens, showcasing the government’s intent to instill certain civic responsibilities.
Amend cousins thirty-eight, thirty-nine, and forty-two, they led to trouble and political stew.
Imagine a tree of democracy with roots buried deep in the Constitution; when storm winds of change blew, branches bent, some broke, but others grew back stronger.
FRAUD: Fundamental Rights Altered, Unjustly Dominated.
JAM: Judicial Action after the Amendments emphasizes the judiciary's role in safeguarding rights.
Term
What is the significance of the 42nd Amendment?
Click to flip
Term
What does the Kesavananda Bharati case signify?
Click to flip
A period of national crisis wherein civil liberties may be curtailed and extra powers granted to the government.
A formal change or addition proposed to a constitution.
A landmark Supreme Court case that established the basic structure doctrine of the constitution.
The power of the judiciary to examine and invalidate legislative and executive actions that conflict with the Constitution.
This section discusses the controversial amendments to the Indian Constitution, particularly those enacted during the 1970s, highlighting the socio-political context and key legal implications.
Focusing on specific amendments made during the 1970s, particularly the 38th, 39th, and 42nd amendments, this section addresses the political controversies surrounding them, the impact of the Emergency period, and the judicial responses that followed, including later amendments that aimed to restore constitutional balance.
The section elaborates on the amendments to the Indian Constitution that sparked significant controversy, particularly during the period of national emergency from 1975 to 1977. It underscores how the 38th, 39th, and 42nd amendments were perceived by opposition parties as attempts to subvert democratic values and judicial authority.